Here is an awesome illustration by Francis Chan on how NOT to make disciples.
Category: Men of Steel
Feature Article on Kim Chafee
Kim Chafee is one of our members at King’s Grant who is actively involved in ministry as a hospice chaplain at Sentara Hospice at Rosemont. She is the subject of a feature article this week with Baptist Women in Ministry.
I am so proud of her accomplishments and that she has chosen to spend her life with me.
Welcoming Children in Ministry
This lesson is about how to welcome children into our adult discipleship ministry, and the importance of passing faith on to the next generation. Our passage today is Matthew 19:13-15, here we have the parallel passages in the synoptic gospels:
The purpose of this study is to develop an awareness of the spiritual receptivity of children and the tremendous opportunity to evangelize both the children and the parents by offering to pray a blessing over these little ones. Jesus commanded us to let the children alone, and do not hinder them from coming to me. Obedience to this command requires developing a tenderness toward children rather than seeing them as a problem or inconvenience to our adult discipleship program.
The chronology of the Harmony of the Gospels (in Matthew 19:13) appears to suggest that immediately after Jesus had finished teaching the Twelve about marriage, divorce, remarriage, and singleness (Matthew 19:13–12), another group of people came seeking his ministry. At that time some children were brought to him, doubtless by their parents. Both Mark and Luke use the imperfect tense, “they were bringing children,” indicating a continual process, likely over an extended period of time (Mark 10:13, Luke 18:15). When word spread that Jesus was in the area, parents were drawn to this teacher whose love of children have become known throughout Palestine, (Matthew 17:18, 18:2-3, John 4:50).
The commands in this section are: Matthew 19:14, let the children alone, do not hinder, Mark 10:14, permit, do not hinder, Luke 18:16, permit, stop hindering.
1. Where was Jesus when he gave this command? (Mark 10:1, 10, 17) Perea, a region east of the Jordan River and south of Galilee that factors prominently in the ministries of John the Baptist and Jesus. Perea was part of the kingdom of Herod the Great; after his death in 4 BC, it was given (along with Galilee) to Herod Antipas.
2. When were these children brought to Jesus? Matthews implies a close connection with the preceding event. Apparently, the children were brought to him personally while Jesus was in the house, (Mark 10:10) before beginning the journey mentioned in Mark 10:17.
3. Why do you think they were bringing children to Jesus? (Mark 10:13) This text says that, they were bringing children to him, and Luke 18:15 says, they were bringing even their babies to him. The impersonal “they” probably included some fathers, or older sisters, or the mothers. In Mark 10:13, the word “them” is masculine and indicates that those bringing the children were not exclusively mothers.
4. How old were the children that were brought to Jesus? (Matthew 19:13, 15, Mark 10:13, Luke 18:15) The Greek word used here for children is a term referring to young children from infancy through perhaps toddler age. The word was used in Mark 5:39 of a slave girl 12 years old, but it generally referred to young children. The ages of the children no doubt varied, including some babies in their mother’s arms, (Luke 18:15). The verb “bringing” does not necessitate the view that the children were carried.
5. Why were the children being brought to Jesus? (Matthew 19:13, 15, Mark 10:13, Luke 18:15) Mark 10:13 says, so that he might touch them. Matthew’s statement interprets the character of this desire touched, so that they might lay his hands on them and pray, (Matthew 19:13). Jesus had just championed the sanctity of marriage and the home, now those bringing their children wanted this great teacher to pronounce his benediction and blessing upon their children. Clearly, his demeanor had strengthened this desire. There is no warrant for assuming any superstitious idea that this wonderworking touch would convey magical benefits.
6. What is significant about the laying on of hands in prayer by Jesus? (Mark 10:16) The text clearly identifies that the kind of touch and prayer that these parents were seeking from Jesus was a blessing for their children. The text says, and they took them in his arms and again blessing them, laying his hands on them.
The Greek form behind the word “blessing” is intensive, occurring only here in the New Testament. It indicates a passionate fervency, expressing the earnestness of Christ’s emotion, better understood as, he “fervently blessed” these children. Jesus must have smiled with infinite kindness as he looked into the faces of those tiny children. We do not know the specific nature of the blessing, but we can assume that he promised the provision of God on their behalf and the care of God over each one of them.
The Talmud taught Jewish parents to bring their children to respected Rabbis for blessings in prayer. A father would customarily bring his infant child to the synagogue and pray for the child himself. He would then hand the child to the elders, who would each hold the baby and pray for God’s blessing on the young life. Many churches today follow a somewhat similar pattern in prayerfully dedicating small children to the Lord.
This is very similar to the practice that came out of the patriarchal period, (Genesis 48:13–16). Following in this tradition, those Jewish parents in Perea brought their children to Jesus to be blessed. He was not only a popular (if not controversial) Rabbi known for his miracle working power, but was also known for his compassion and his willingness to meet the needs of even the lowliest and most helpless people of society. If he were indeed the Messiah, as he claimed to be, those parents saw a marvelous opportunity to have their children blessed by the Lord own anointed one, the deliverer of Israel.
Because Jesus did not rebuke the parents or resist blessing their children, it is obvious that their motives were pure. They did not understand Jesus’ true greatness, and probably few, if any, of them had put their trust in him as Savior and Lord, but they recognized him as a genuine teacher from God who loved them and who cared for their precious children. They therefore sought his intercession with God on their children’s behalf, in the hope that they might grow up as the Talmud admonished: strong in the law, faithful and marriage, and known by good works.
7. What are some practical suggestions when people praying a blessing upon a Child? In the book, the family blessing by Roth Garborg, he makes the following suggestions,
1) Explain that you are planning to do and why is important for the child
2) Hold a child in your arms when you bless him
3) Place your hand or hands on the head of the child
4) Always include in your blessing an invocation of the name of God.
Mark 10:16 illustrates this when Jesus took them in his arms and begin laying his hands on them. Mark 10:13 and Luke 18:15 also stress the value of touch, and Matthew 19:13 stresses the prayer component of the blessing.
8. How did the disciples respond to these children coming to Jesus? (Matthew 19:13, Mark 10:13, Luke 18:15) The disciples who were outside the house were intent on protecting Jesus from what they considered an unnecessary and perhaps undignified intrusion upon his time and energy. Clearly the disciples did not make access to Jesus and easy matter. They acted in a bossy sense of their own importance as his protectors.
The verb “rebuked” indicates that they provoked or censored the action with the intention of bringing it to an end. The Greek verb behind “rebuke” carries the idea of threatening, and being in the perfect tense suggest that the rebuke was a continuous as the bringing. As more and more parents brought their children to Jesus, the disciples continue to try to rebuke them. Obviously the Twelve, who had spent almost 18 months living with Jesus and his “come and be with me” phase of discipleship and heard every word he spoke and observe everything he did, still didn’t fully share his mind and heartbeat. The disciples felt that Jesus had more important matters to deal with than to spend his time on the little children.
Earlier Jesus had taken a young child in his arms in the disciples’ presence. Specifically for the sake of the disciples, who are in the midst of a dispute about who was the greatest in the kingdom, he declared, whoever then humbles himself as this child, he is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven, (Matthew 18:1–4). No doubt a countless other times the disciples had witnessed similar expressions of Jesus’ tenderness and gentleness and his great patience with those who came to him for help. Had they remembered his teaching concerning children in Capernaum, (Mark 9:36–37, Matthew 18:2–14) they could hardly have objected now.
9. How would you have felt if it was your child who was turned away?
10. How did Jesus emotionally respond when he saw children being rebuked? (Mark 10:14) The text says, when Jesus saw this, he was indignant. When Jesus noticed from inside the house what was going on outside the house, he was filled with righteous anger, (Hebrews 4:15, 1 Peter 1:19). His short response was prompted by what he saw.
The verb, “was indignant” is used of Jesus only here. It is a term of strong emotion, but denotes his pained, angry reaction to what was going on. He was deeply displeased that the very men whom he had so explicitly taught, so grievously misunderstood the basic principle of what was involved.
11. What to commands did Jesus give his disciples? (Matthew 19:15, Mark 10:14, Luke 18:16) Jesus said, let the children alone, and do not hinder them from coming to me. This double command at the end put an end to the interference of the disciples. The aorist imperative, “let the children alone” denotes urgency. Mark uses a different first command to correct his disciples’ behavior, permit the children to come to me, (Mark 10:14). The imperative “permit or allow” was a command demanding that they permit the children at once, to have continued access to him. The command sees the children themselves being hindered, rather than their parents being hindered, perhaps they had eagerly run toward Jesus on their own. The present tense of the second imperative is more literally translated “stop hindering them.” The disciples had put out restraining hands, but they were told to cease their interference.
12. Was Jesus saying by the phrase, “for the kingdom of heaven belongs to such as these” that all children are saved? (Matthew 19:15, Mark 10:14, Luke 18:16) Jesus was not naïvely sentimental about children. Having created them, he knew they were born with a sinful nature. Children have a certain innocence, but they are not sinless. He knew that they did not have to be taught to do wrong, that their little hearts were naturally bent toward evil, but he loved them with a special compassion. Because of their natural openness and trustfulness, he held them up as examples of the attitude required for kingdom citizenship, (Matthew 18:3–5). The phrase “to such as” denotes those who have certain definite qualities or characteristics. Jesus was not thinking of children exclusively but of them as representative of the spirit of receptivity, dependence, and trustfulness. It is simple that counts and not tender years.
13. What is the reason Jesus gives for permitting the children to have access to him? (Matthew 19:14, Mark 10:14, Luke 18:16) The reason Jesus wants children to have access to him is found in the words, “for the kingdom of heaven belongs to such as these.”
14. How can we hinder her children from coming to Jesus today?
1) Abortion
2) Not providing transportation to Sunday school or church
3) Handling children in small groups as an inconvenience
4) Living hypocritical lives – Timothy grew up in a home with a mother and grandmother who had and authentic faith, (2 Timothy 1:5) and shared the Scriptures with him throughout his childhood, (2 Timothy 3:15).
15. How do Mark 10:15 and Luke 18:17 expanded his reason for allowing the children access to him? Jesus added, truly I say to you, whoever does not receive the kingdom of God like a child will not enter it at all. The point of comparison is not the innocence of children, (for they have a sinful nature and are not innocent) but their attitude of receptiveness and willingness to depend upon others for what they need. The verb “receive” stresses that excepting eternal life as a gift from God is a definite act, it is not a human achievement. Entrance into the kingdom can never be obtained on the basis of human merit. Just as a child receives a gift from a loved one in gentleness and trustfulness, so the kingdom of God must be received as God’s gift in simple, trusting faith. Here is the essence of the doctrine of justification by faith, (Romans 5:17).
The phrase, “will not enter it at all” is a strong double negative in the Greek that categorically excludes any other way of entry. Use of the word, “enter” pictures the kingdom of God as a society under his sovereign rule, where an individual becomes a member by subjected himself to the divine authority. Refusing to receive the kingdom as a gift excludes one from sharing in its blessings and responsibilities.
This is why children need access to Jesus. Even though they naturally possess the traits needed to become a child of God, they still need to personally receive them. Jesus wanted every boy and girl to experience the promised blessings of Abraham, (Galatians 3:8–9). Jesus wanted his Father’s face to shine on these little ones. Jesus knew that children are far more receptive than adults. The older people get, the more set they become in their ways. Their conscience often becomes seared, (1 Timothy 4:2) and they suppress the truth in unrighteousness, (Romans 1:18).
16. How did Jesus respond to the disciples’ actions and attitudes toward children? (Mark 10:14). From Mark we learn that Jesus was greatly indignant with his disciples. They frequently frustrated and disappointed Jesus by their insensitivity and selfishness, but this is one of only two or three occasions on which he actually became angry with them.
It is likely there were a number of reasons why he was angry with them. He was angry because he loves little children with great affection. He also no doubt felt special compassion for them because of the sinful, painful, corrupt world into which they have been born and whose evils they would progressively have to face as they grew up. He was angry because he loved parents and understood the special longings and anxieties they have for their children. He realized that loving little children was a way to their parents’ hearts. He was angry because no one, not even the tiniest infant, is outside the care and love of God. He was angry because of the disciples’ persistent spiritual dullness and hardness. He doubtlessly was angry because the disciples presumed to determine who could and could not approach him, the Christ and the son of God. It was neither within their prerogative nor their competency to make such choices. It was presumption for them to hinder the parents and their children from coming to Jesus. Specifically, he was angry because the kingdom of heaven belongs to, encompasses and is characterized by children such as these.
17. Can young children be genuinely saved? When children can knowingly sin they can knowingly be saved. People often talk in terms of the age of accountability. This age may differ from child to child but when a child has the capacity to grasp the basic concepts of sin and forgiveness, God can illuminate his understanding of what it means to trust in Jesus as their Lord and Savior, and he or she can experience personal saving faith that is required to enter the kingdom of God.
The implication of “such as these” is that for those who, because of young age or mental deficiency, are incapable of exercising saving faith, God grants them, in the event of death, entrance into the kingdom by the sovereign operation of his grace. These children die before they reach the age of decision, they go into the presence of Jesus Christ, because they are under the special protection of the sovereign King.
It was that comforting truth that David expressed when he lost his infant son born to Bathsheba. “I shall go to him,” David said, “but he will not return to me” (2 Samuel 12:23). While the statement may indicate little more than a resignation to their both entering the realm of the dead, a personal pronoun such as “I” and “him,” as well as David’s confident belief in the life to come, lend support to the idea that he was confident of personal consciousness and identity in the life to come. David knew that he belonged to God and would one day into his presence, and he had equal confidence that when he entered into the Lord’s presence that he would meet the little son who had preceded him.
It is not that small children are regenerate and then lose their salvation if they do not later receive Christ as Lord and Savior. It is rather that his atoning death is applied on their behalf if they die before they are able to choose on their own. It may be that the infant mortality rate is so high in many countries where the gospel has not yet been penetrated because the Lord is taking those little ones to himself before they can grow up in a culture where it is so difficult to encounter the gospel and believe.
What an awesome responsibility faces Christian parents to make sure that their children are taught about Christ and are led to receive him as Savior when they were able to exercise saving faith.
18. Who will make up the population of the kingdom of heaven? (Luke 18:17). Luke’s parallel passage reports that Jesus then declared, as he had a short while earlier, “truly I say to you, whoever does not receive the kingdom of God like a child shall not enter it at all” (Matthew 18:3). In other words the kingdom is populated by only two kinds of subjects, those who die while little children and those who come in the trusting and humble attitude of a little child. Only those that come to him in the simplicity, openness, dependency, lack of pretension, and the lack of hypocrisy of little children will enter the kingdom of heaven. This is the requirement for kingdom citizenship.
19. How can we understand this teaching in light of Paul telling us to put away childish things? (1 Corinthians 13:11) The impatience of the disciples (Mark 10:13) is perhaps more understandable given the apparently ceaseless demands made upon Jesus and the Twelve by people, and given the general attitude of the time that children, while important and loved by parents, were nevertheless very definitely “to be seen and not heard.” Paul’s contrast between a mere child, who “as long as [he] is a child, he is no different from a slave,” and an adult in Galatians 4:1–3. On the other hand, Jesus’ welcoming of the children (Mark 10:16) is another example of his positive attitude toward those who did not have important social status, such as tax gatherers (Mark 2:13–17) or women (Mark 10:1–12).
In 1 Corinthians 13:11-12, in the context of chapters 12-14, Paul offers a dramatic metaphor in regard to the putting aside of childish ways. Immaturity gives way to maturity, so that a childish concern with flamboyant gifts should run its course and end with the advent of a mature concern for love. The pattern of Paul’s logic is the contrast of lesser with greater, so that through these images he admonishes the Corinthians to have less concern for spectacular spiritual gifts and a greater concern for the reality of love, God’s own love.
So, the point is that all living things grow, children into adults, and immaturity into maturity. Therefore we must come to Christ with the faith of a child, but we do not continue to hold on to childish things.
20. What does the Bible say about the evangelization of children? 1
Jesus’ desire is that “repentance for the forgiveness of sins will be preached in his name to all nations” (Luke 24:47). The mission field is “all nations.” There are no geographical restrictions to the gospel, no cultural restrictions, and no age restrictions. Everyone needs to repent and be forgiven, including the children of “all nations.” Children, therefore, should be evangelized.
The Bible says that children are a blessing from God (Psalm 127:3). They are in need of instruction (Proverbs 8:32–33) and are quite able to learn. Timothy was a student of the Word at a very young age. He knew the Holy Scriptures “from infancy” (2 Timothy 3:15), having been taught by his godly mother and grandmother (2 Timothy 1:5).
Children are fully able to praise God. In celebrating the Lord’s majestic name, the psalmist sings, “Through the praise of children and infants you have established a stronghold against your enemies” (Psalm 8:2). Praise is not something children must wait until they’re older to do—it is their joyful task now. When Jesus arrived in the temple, the chief priests were aloof and reproachful, but not the kids. The children were “shouting in the temple courts, ‘Hosanna to the Son of David’” (Matthew 21:15).
In our passage today, Jesus used the occasion of blessing the children to point out the need for faith. The kingdom must be received “like a little child” (Mark 10:15). Children do not strive to earn the kingdom of God but trust Him to give it to them. Theirs is a simple faith. Jesus declared that whoever does not receive the kingdom of God like a child, with simple trust and dependence on God, cannot enter. Only those with a childlike trust in God can be saved.
Elsewhere, Jesus directs our attention to a child to illustrate true humility and the relationship God wants with all of us. The disciples had asked the Lord about who would be the “greatest” in heaven. In response, “He called a little child to him, and placed the child among them. And he said: ‘Truly I tell you, unless you change and become like little children, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven. Therefore, whoever takes the lowly position of this child is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven. And whoever welcomes one such child in my name welcomes me’” (Matthew 18:2–5).
In the next verse, Jesus strongly advocates for the protection of children: “If anyone causes one of these little ones—those who believe in me—to stumble, it would be better for them to have a large millstone hung around their neck and to be drowned in the depths of the sea” (Matthew 18:6). Jesus specifies that these children are among “those who believe in me.” This plainly indicates that children can believe in Jesus! If they can believe in Jesus, then we must evangelize them.
We must also never cause a believing child to stumble. “Cause to stumble” means “to entrap, trip up or entice to sin.” How does one cause believing children to stumble? Probably when we reject or ignore them—this would be the opposite of welcoming them (Matthew 18:5)—or when we lead them into sin.
Ephesians is a letter addressed to “God’s holy people in Ephesus, the faithful in Christ Jesus” (Ephesians 1:1). Paul describes them as having redemption through the blood of Christ and forgiveness of sins (Ephesians 1:7). Therefore, the original recipients of this epistle were believers in Christ. Toward the end of the letter, Paul addresses different groups of believers and instructs them on how they can walk in a way worthy of their calling. Children are commanded to obey (in the Lord) their parents (Ephesians 6:1). The fact that Paul addresses children implies that they were saints—part of “God’s holy people in Ephesus.” Children today can and should also trust in Christ, just as the children in Ephesus did.
In the letter to Titus, the qualifications for elders are laid out (Titus 1:6–9): being above reproach, being the husband of one wife, etc. In the list of qualifications is having “children who believe.” If they believe, they must have been evangelized.
In the Old Testament, there was an emphasis on transmitting God’s Law to the next generation so that they, too, would fear the LORD and obey His Word. Moses reminded the people of Israel to obey God’s laws in Deuteronomy 6:1–9. The command was not only for the present generation but also for their children and grandchildren (Deuteronomy 6:1–2). The first priority of parents was their own obedience; God’s Word was to be in their hearts (Deuteronomy 6:5–6), and then they were to teach it to their children (Deuteronomy 6:7). These same principles are applicable to Christian parents today.
If we fail to share the gospel with the next generation, we risk repeating Israel’s mistake in Judges 2:10–11, “After that whole generation had been gathered to their ancestors, another generation grew up who knew neither the Lord nor what he had done for Israel. Then the Israelites did evil in the eyes of the Lord and served the Baals.” What is needed in every nation, every day, is the transforming power of the gospel of Christ. Sharing the gospel with children is commanded and blessed by God.
Sources:
- The Serendipity Bible for Groups
- The MacArthur New Testament Commentary, Matthew 16-23
- The Expositor’s Bible Commentary vol. 8
- New Testament Commentary, Mark, William Hendriksen
- Mark, Portrait of a Servant, Edmond Hiebert
- He Came to Serve, Thomas Lovejoy
- The Blessing, Smalley and Trent
- The Interpretation of St. Matthew’s Gospel, R.C.H. Lenski
- The Power of Spoken Blessings, Bill Gothard
- The Family Blessing, Rolf Garborg
- The Wordless Book, Child Evangelism Fellowship
- Safe in the Arms of God, John MacArthur
[print_link] [email_link] [Based on my classes with Richard D. Leineweber, Jr. c. 2000]
1 www.gotquestions.org
How to Make Lasting Change
We are often perplexed on why we make commitments to change yet fall miserably short of success. One essential start is to make your life based on the Bible:
“If you continue in My word, then you are truly disciples of Mine.” (John 8:31b NASB)
One cannot stress enough how important it is to make a commitment to reading the Bible regularly. Jesus said, “If you continue in My word, then you are truly disciples of Mine” (John 8:31b NASB). It’s a long-term commitment to learn from Jesus and his Word that makes us his disciples.
How do you continue in the Word and stay connected with Jesus through his Word for the long-term?
1. Make the decision. It starts with your commitment to actually do it. Don’t wait for a better time to make God’s Word a regular part of your life. Start your commitment today.
2. Make a declaration. Announce your intentions to others. Hold yourself accountable and allow yourself to be held accountable by others. If you keep your commitment to God a secret, it’s easier to slip up.
3. Make a determination. Don’t allow anything to knock you off your commitment. Absolute determination can make this a permanent habit in your life, particularly in the early months. If you start skipping days, it will be much harder to stay committed to God’s Word.
4. Double up. Get a spiritual partner to come alongside you for support and encouragement. This is someone with whom you can share what you learn in your quiet times. It could be someone in your small group, a friend, or a family member. The Bible says, “Two people are better off than one, for they can help each other succeed” (Ecclesiastes 4:9 NLT).
[print_link] [email_link] [Based on a devotion by Rick Warren]
How to Walk Circumspectly
Today we are looking at the end of the Sermon on the Mount, “How to Walk Circumspectly” from Matthew 7:13–27. That is not a word we often use but it does describe very well the topic for today. Circumspectly is defined this way: 1. watchful and discreet; cautious; prudent: circumspect behavior; 2. well-considered: circumspect ambition.
Here are the commands that we find in the gospels: Matthew 4:17 – repent, Matthew 7:13 – enter, Matthew 7:15 – beware, Matthew 11:28 – come, Mark 1:15 – repent, believe, John 6:27 – do not work, John 12:35 – walk, John 12:36 – believe.
It is also illustrated in the book of acts: Acts 9:2, 16:17, John 14:6, Acts 19:9, 23, 22:4, 24:14, 22.
It is also amplified in the epistles: Romans 1:1–5:21, 2 Corinthians 13:5, Ephesians 2:1–10.
Group Questions:
1. How do we know that the multitude joined the disciples when he gave this command? (Matthew 5:1, 16, 45).
2. What is significant about the command to “enter by the narrow gate” in Matthew 7:13?
3. Why do so “few” enter by the narrow gate? (Matthew 7:13, Luke 13:23–24)
4. What is similar about the narrow and wide gates? What is the difference between them? (Matthew 7:13, 14)
5. How can we determine that someone has entered through the narrow gate? (Matthew 7:13, 14)
6. The destiny of those who choose to broad way is destruction. Does destruction mean existence or annihilation? (Matthew 7:13, 18:8, 25:41, 46, 2 Thessalonians 1:9)
7. Why does Jesus warn his audience concerning false teachers? (Matthew 7:15)
8. What did Jesus say what the criteria for judging between true and false prophets? (Matthew 7:16–20)
9. How does Jesus’ message compare to John the Baptist’ message? (Matthew 7:19, 3:10)
10. What kind of fruit was John the Baptist looking for? (Matthew 3:8, Luke 3:8–14)
11. Is the profession of faith “Lord, Lord,” adequate enough to secure a place in the kingdom of heaven? (Matthew 7:21, Romans 10:13)
12. Is your assurance of salvation based on a past act or present obedience? (Matthew 7:21)
13. What is a possible explanation for the claims of false believers in Matthew 7:22?
14. Who are the “many” that will face “that day” of divine judgment? (Matthew 7:13, 22)
15. What does it mean when Jesus said, “I never knew you?” (Matthew 7:23, Galatians 4:8, 9)
16. What is the only difference between the construction of the two houses? (Matthew 7:24–27)
17. What does the sand in Matthew 7:26 represent?
18. What does the storm in Matthew 7:25, 27 represent?
19. Who does Jesus rebuke through the story of the two builders? Why? (Luke 6:46–49)
20. Why did the multitudes respond with astonishment to Jesus’ message? (Matthew 7:28, 29)
Section Outline:
- Two gates, two roads, two destinations (Matthew 7:13, 14)
- Two kinds of fruit (Matthew 7:15–20)
- Two types of professions (Matthew 7:21–23)
- Two foundations (Matthew 7:24–27)
Summation: This whole sermon on the mount is summed up in Matthew 5:20, “For I say to you that unless your righteousness surpasses that of the scribes and Pharisees, you will not enter the kingdom of heaven.” Entrance into the kingdom is dependent upon righteousness. How righteous do you need to be? Jesus said in Matthew 5:20 that you need to be more righteous than that of the scribes and Pharisees.
From a human perspective, the Pharisees were very righteous, but Christ commands a righteousness that exceeds theirs. In fact, our Lord requires a righteousness that is beyond man’s capacity to attain. It is a righteous does that can only come from the holy God. (Philippians 3:9, Luke 18:9–14).
This will leave man with two options: either they invent their own religion, or they live God’s way. They must decide whether to try to get to heaven on their own terms, or come to heaven on God’s terms. Think about taking out a bank loan, it’s always on their terms.
In the Land Before Time movie, several little dinosaurs are making their way to the Big Valley, a place of peace, old friends and family, food, and free from meat eating dinosaurs (somewhat representing heaven). The road is long and hard but the one called Cera wants to take a different, less strenuous route, with the objection, “but you’re going the wrong way.” One tiny friend named Ducky makes a great observation, “Cera’s way is easier.”
Jesus said the broad gate leads to the broad way and destruction. It is the way of easy religion and human righteousness. The scribes, Pharisees, and other people who think they are good enough to get into heaven travel that road. On the other hand, the narrow gate that precedes the narrow way leads to life. That is where people with broken hearts and contrite spirits go. They know they can’t keep God’s standards and be perfect like him. They cast themselves on the mercy of Christ, who gives them his own righteousness.
Two Gates:
These two gates represent two ways of salvation. All the religions of the world walk through one of these two gates. Man’s way of salvation focuses on “human achievement” (self righteousness). It is a DO system. This approach is man’s attempt for his good things to outweigh the bad things he does in this life. God’s way of salvation focuses on “divine accomplishment” (Christ righteousness), it’s a DONE system. The Bible teaches there is nothing that we can do to get saved it, it’s already been done through the finished work of Christ on the cross at Calvary.
The Narrow or Small Gate: Matthew 7:13a, 14 “enter through the narrow gate, … for the gate is small and the way is narrow that leads to life, and there are a few who find it.”
The word “find” is important: it tells us that we have to search for the narrow gate. It requires effort. Jeremiah 29:13 says, you will seek me and find me when you search for me with all your heart. No one stumbles into the kingdom of God inadvertently. You have to search for it. (Matthew 7:13a, 7:14, John 14:6, 1 Timothy 2:5-6, Acts 4:12, 16:17, Luke 13:24).
The word strive is the Greek word “agonizomai” which means “to agonize.” It is difficult to come to God on his terms. You must recognize your inability to be righteous enough to please God, which means getting rid of your pride. This requires acknowledging that we have lost our way, confession, and repentance from sin. There must be a childlike humility, trust, and dependence on God alone to to rescue or save us from the penalty of our sin. This means placing no confidence in the flesh (Philippians 3:3).
The Wide Gate: Matthew 7:13b, “but the gate is wide and the way his broad that leads to destruction, and there are many who enter through it.”
Two Roads:
The Narrow Way: Matthew 7:14, “for the gate is small and the way his narrow that leads to life, and there are a few who find it.”
In 2 Timothy 3:16, we read that “all Scripture is inspired by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for training in righteousness.” This illustration helps us to understand what these four points really mean.
The early church was called The Way because it taught that Jesus Christ was the only way to heaven and obedience to his commands was the only way to live here on earth. Acts 19:9 is a good example.
- But when some were becoming hardened and disobedient, speaking evil of the Way before the people, he withdrew from them and took away the disciples, reasoning daily in the school of Tyrannus. (Acts 19:9)
- But this I admit to you, that according to the Way which they call a sect I do serve the God of our fathers, believing everything that is in accordance with the Law and what is written in the Prophets. (Acts 24:14)
The Broad Way: “for the gate is wide and the way his broad that leads to destruction, and there are many who enter through it.” (Matthew 7:13b)
Two Destinations: “for the gate is small and the way his narrow that leads to life, and there are few who find it.” (Matthew 7:14). “For the gate is wide and the way is broad that leads to destruction, and there are many who enter through it (Matthew 7:13b). The word here for destruction really means “the absence of well-being,” never annihilation.
Two Kinds of Fruit: Jesus said that false prophets add to the difficulty of entering the narrow gate. They stand at the crossroads, trying to push people toward the broad road. They try to divert people for Satan’s purposes. False prophets tell people that they can go to heaven with all their sin and all their selfishness. Read Matthew 7:15-20.
In this passage, Jesus says, as you strive to enter that narrow gate, beware of those who try to mislead you. The Bible warns us repeatedly about false prophets… (Deuteronomy 13:1–5, Isaiah 30:9–10, Jeremiah 5:1, 14:14, 23:14–16, 23:21, 28, Zechariah 11:16-17, Matthew 24:11, 24, Romans 16:17–18, 2 Corinthians 11:26, 1 Timothy 4:1–2, 2 Peter 2:1, 1 John 4:1).
The command “beware” in Matthew 7:15, should be enough to let us know that false prophets are dangerous. Whenever I see the word “beware” on a sign, I stop. I don’t want to run into a huge dog. I want to be careful not to get electrocuted. Beware is a strong word, the Greek word for it means “hold your mind away from.” Don’t ever expose your mind to the influence of false prophets. Don’t pay attention to them, they pervert the mind and poison the soul.
The worst enemy of sheep is a wolf. Hired laborers just run away, but wolves eat the sheep. The good shepherd protects his flock, a hired laborer abandons the flock that is entrusted to him, but the false prophet destroys sheep. They are ravenous wolves. The verb form of the Greek word for ravening in Matthew 7:15, literally means “to snatch or to seize.”
In the Old Testament, and in the case of John the Baptist in the New Testament, a prophet was known by what he wore. Elijah wore a rough, hairy, burlap garment (2 Kings 1:8). That was a statement to society that he was giving up personal comforts for the Lord’s cause. John the Baptist lived in the wilderness, ate locusts and wild honey, and and wore a rough camel hair coat. Camel hair products today or not the same that they used to be; they were very uncomfortable. He wore the clothing of a prophet. God’s prophets had no worldly goods and did not wear worldly clothes. They looked as if they had come in from the wilderness, where they communed with God.
False prophets know about the proper clothing. Zechariah 13:4 even says that a false prophet will “wear a rough garment to deceive.”
When Jesus said that a false prophet wore sheep’s clothing, he wasn’t talking about a person crawling on his hands and knees wearing a sheepskin and a sheepshead. Most shepherds wore cloaks made from sheep’s wool, which is the mark of a shepherd. He needed a warm cloak because it Israel the evenings are cold. So when Jesus spoke of false prophets in sheep clothing, he was talking about people dressed like a shepherd. Sheep clothing is another term for wool. Just as a false prophet would wear the clothing of a prophet, a false shepherd wears the clothing of a shepherd. Jesus wasn’t talking about a sheep’s disguise. He was talking about a shepherd’s disguise. A false shepherd looks like a shepherd, but he is really a wolf.
There was an old proverb that says, “like root, like fruit.” The Jews, Greeks, and Romans all said that a tree is judged by its fruit. If you want to know whether a prophet is true or false, look at what he produces. What is the fruit of his character, conduct, creed, and converts? Be careful: just because a person is associated with Christians doesn’t mean that he can’t to be a false prophet (Acts 20:29-31).
Two Professions:
Keep in mind that the Lord was not speaking to irreligious people, but to people who were obsessed with religious activity. They were apostates, heretics, or atheists; they weren’t anti-God. The people Christ spoke to were religious, but they were damned because they were self-deluded and on the wrong road. A false prophet could’ve caused their delusion, or they have delude themselves. Using Paul’s words, they were people that had held “to a form of godliness, although they have denied it’s power” (2 Timothy 3:5). Remember that there are many who enter through the wide gate (Matthew 7:21-23).
Self Deception: JC Ryle, a 19th century English Pastor, wrote,” the Lord Jesus winds up the sermon on the mount by a passage of heart piercing application. He turns from false prophets to false professors, the unsound teachers to unsound hearers.” it is not only false teachers who make the narrow way difficult to find and still harder to walk. A man may also be grievously self deceived.
Some people think they are saved because they go to church, hear sermons, sing songs, read the Bible, and go to a Bible study or class. They are completely involved in religious activity, but that’s a great illusion. There are many people in the church who are not saved. They are tares among the wheat (Matthew 13:24–30).
Dr. Elton Trueblood, a protestant philosopher of religion, said, “our main mission field today, as far as America is concerned, is within the church membership itself.” Theologian Karl Barth, who wasn’t evangelical but is recognized as a major theologian in modern times, said, “the true function of the church consists first of all in its own regeneration.” The church is full of people who say empty words. They say they are Christians, but don’t do God’s will. Romans 10:9 says, “if you confess with your mouth Jesus as Lord, and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved.” Confession is necessary, but confession without obedience is a sham.
In the 1990s, researcher George Barna startled the church with what he termed, “one of the rudest awakenings I have ever received in my uppers to help the churches grow.” He said, “half of all the adults who attended Protestant churches on a typical Sunday morning or not Christian. Churches are filled with individuals who by reason of tradition, misinformation, demonic deception, or something else have never come to a Grace-based relationship with Jesus Christ. They are lost in church.” For more check out www.lostinchurch.com.
- Titus 1:16 says, “they profess to know God, but by their deeds they deny him, being detestable and disobedient and worthless for any good deed.”
- Luke 6:46 says, “why do you call me, “Lord, Lord,” and do not do what I say?”
The word “Lord” is Kurios, it is used for the name Jehovah in the Septuagint. In it, the people are staying, “We know you are God. We except all of your divinty involving the virgin birth, miraculous life, substitutionary death, powerful resurrection, intercession, and second coming.” These people use the right terms and appear to have the right attitudes.
Since they use the term, Lord, Lord twice, this indicates there fervency. If the judgment spoken of here in Matthew 7 refers to the great white throne judgment, then those people will have already spent centuries in a place of punishment. That will add to their fervency. They will say, “Lord, why are we being punished?”
These people will get a terrible shock. You say, “you mean God won’t know who those people are?” No, God knows everything. We are not talking about an awareness of who someone is. In the Bible the word “know” is often used to speak of an intimate relationship (Galatians 4:8-9).
Why does God ask them to depart from him? According to the end of Matthew 7:23, they were those who practice lawlessness. In other words, instead of doing the will of the Father, those people continually acted lawlessly. It isn’t what you SAY that get you into the kingdom, it is what you DO with your faith. A profession of Christ is worthless if it isn’t backed up by your life. In a sense, Peter said that if you can’t add virtue to your faith, then you aren’t really redeemed (2 Peter 1:5–10). James said, “faith, if it has no works, is dead, being by itself” (James 2:17).
But They Did Great Works: But wait a minute, these people who made those claims “preached, cast out demons, and they did mighty works.” Here are three alternates.
1. It is possible that they did this by God’s power, God sometimes works through unbelievers, for example Numbers 23:5 and 2 Peter 2:15 (Balaam) or 1 Samuel 10:10 (Saul) or John 11:51-52 (Caiaphas).
2. They may have done these things by Satan’s power. It is possible that self-deluded people did their preaching, exorcism, and wonderful works under the power of the enemy, who can express his power. Do you remember what he did to Job? He brought death, destruction, and disease.
- God allowed the witch of Endor to conjure an evil spirit impersonating Samuel (1 Samuel 28:7–12).
- According to Acts 19:13-14, the sons of Sceva cast out demons.
- Jesus even acknowledge that some Jewish people had probably cast out demons when he said, “if I by Beelzebub cast out demons, by whom do your sons cash them out?” (Matthew 12:27).
- There are false prophets that would prophesy signs and wonders that really did happen, (Deuteronomy 13).
- Jesus said that false prophets would do signs and wonders (Matthew 24:24). The antichrist will even do them (2 Thessalonians 2:8–10).
3. They may have faked what they did. Some of what appears to be wonderful works can be just fakery. In Exodus 7 and 8, the magicians of Egypt who tried to copy Moses miracles were just doing tricks.
Two Foundations:
According to Matthew 7:24–27, “Anyone who hears these words of mine and ask on them.” This is the one who obeys his commands and does his will. (Also Luke 6:46-49).
Those who say they are Christians or hear what God says won’t necessarily go to heaven but rather those who live a life of obedience. Jesus is not talking about the perfection of a persons life but rather it’s overall direction. The fruit of obedience is the evidence that a person is truly saved.
By this we know that we have come to know him, if we keep his commandments (1 John 2:3). But he answered and said to them, my mother and brothers are those who hear the word of God and do it (Luke 8:21).
Salvation is established by a past act, but verified by present to obedience. People are often told because they said the right prayer and sign the card, they don’t have to worry about whether not they are saved. They are fooled into thinking they are saved when in reality the Spirit of God never was involved and their lives never changed. Don’t tell a person, “I know you are saved because you did the right thing. Don’t ever doubt your salvation.” There is no way you can know if a person really came to know Christ. Don’t risk giving that person false assurance. Some people are deceived because they never examined their lives Second Corinthians 13:5 says, “test yourself to see if you are in the faith, examine yourselves.”
Lost in Church:
How would your approach to evangelism be different if you knew that up to one half of the people attending your church were not Christians? (Barna, Bill Bright, North American Mission Board) Many of these type Christians do not know whether they will experience eternal life, eternal damnation, or some other outcome.
Research says that many who attend Protestant churches have been anesthetized to the Gospel. Many have mentally excepted correct beliefs but have “lived without a shred of insight into what a relationship with Jesus Christ is all about.” Many refer to this as reaching the 7:21 window.
Paths to Salvation:
1. Works = Justification (building your own bridge)
Question: “Why is salvation by works the predominantly held viewpoint? Why do so many people believe that we can be saved by works?” (gotquestions.org)
Answer: The simple answer is that salvation by works seems right in the eyes of man. One of man’s basic desires is to be in control of his own destiny, and that includes his eternal destiny. Salvation by works appeals to man’s pride and his desire to be in control. Being saved by works appeals to that desire far more than the idea of being saved by faith alone. Also, man has an inherent sense of justice. Even the most ardent atheist believes in some type of justice and has a sense of right and wrong, even if he has no moral basis for making such judgments. Our inherent sense of right and wrong demands that if we are to be saved, our “good works” must outweigh our “bad works.” Therefore, it is natural that when man creates a religion it would involve some type of salvation by works.
Because salvation by works appeals to man’s sinful nature, it forms the basis of almost every religion except for biblical Christianity. Proverbs 14:12tells us that “there is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death.” Salvation by works seems right to men, which is why it is the predominantly held viewpoint. That is exactly why biblical Christianity is so different from all other religions—it is the only religion that teaches salvation is a gift of God and not of works. “For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith—and this not from yourselves, it is the gift of God—not by works, so that no one can boast” (Ephesians 2:8–9).
Another reason why salvation by works is the predominantly held viewpoint is that natural or unregenerate man does not fully understand the extent of his own sinfulness or of God’s holiness. Man’s heart is “deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked” (Jeremiah 17:9), and God is infinitely holy (Isaiah 6:3). The deceit of our hearts is the very thing that colors our perception of the extent of that deceit and is what prevents us from seeing our true state before a God whose holiness we are also not able to fully comprehend. But the truth remains that our sinfulness and God’s holiness combine together to make our best efforts as “filthy rags” before a holy God (Isaiah 64:6; cf. 6:1–5).
The thought that man’s good works could ever balance out his bad works is a totally unbiblical concept. Not only that, but the Bible also teaches that God’s standard is nothing less than 100 percent perfection. If we stumble in keeping just one part of God’s righteous law, we are as guilty as if we had broken all of it (James 2:10). Therefore, there is no way we could ever be saved if salvation truly were dependent on works.
Another reason that salvation by works can creep into denominations that claim to be Christian or say they believe in the Bible is that they misunderstand passages like James 2:24: “You see then that a man is justified by works, and not by faith only.” Taken in the context of the entire passage (James 2:14–26), it becomes evident that James is not saying our works make us righteous before God; instead, he is making it clear that real saving faith is demonstrated by good works. The person who claims to be a Christian but lives in willful disobedience to Christ with a life that shows no works has a false or “dead” faith and is not saved. James is making a contrast between two different types of faith—truth faith that saves and false faith that is dead.
There are simply too many verses that teach that one is not saved by works for any Christian to believe otherwise. Titus 3:4–5 is one of many such passages: “But when the kindness and the love of God our Savior toward man appeared, not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to His mercy He saved us, through the washing of regeneration and renewing of the Holy Spirit.” Good works do not contribute to salvation, but they will always be characteristic of one who has been born again. Good works are not the cause of salvation; they are the evidence of it.
While salvation by works might be the predominantly held viewpoint, it is not an accurate one biblically. The Bible contains abundant evidence of salvation by grace alone, through faith alone, in Christ alone (Ephesians 2:8-9).
2. Faith + Works (merit) = Justification (we do works with a little help from our friend, Jesus)
Question: “Is salvation by faith alone, or by faith plus works?” (gotquestions.org)
Answer: This is perhaps the most important question in all of Christian theology. This question is the cause of the Reformation, the split between the Protestant churches and Catholic Church. This question is a key difference between biblical Christianity and most of the “Christian” cults. Is salvation by faith alone, or by faith plus works? Am I saved just by believing in Jesus, or do I have to believe in Jesus and do certain things?
The question of faith alone or faith plus works is made difficult by some hard-to-reconcile Bible passages. Compare Romans 3:28, 5:1and Galatians 3:24with James 2:24. Some see a difference between Paul (salvation is by faith alone) and James (salvation is by faith plus works). Paul dogmatically says that justification is by faith alone (Ephesians 2:8-9), while James appears to be saying that justification is by faith plus works. This apparent problem is answered by examining what exactly James is talking about. James is refuting the belief that a person can have faith without producing any good works (James 2:17-18). James is emphasizing the point that genuine faith in Christ will produce a changed life and good works (James 2:20-26). James is not saying that justification is by faith plus works, but rather that a person who is truly justified by faith will have good works in his/her life. If a person claims to be a believer, but has no good works in his/her life, then he/she likely does not have genuine faith in Christ (James 2:14, 17, 20, 26).
Paul says the same thing in his writings. The good fruit believers should have in their lives is listed in Galatians 5:22-23. Immediately after telling us that we are saved by faith, not works (Ephesians 2:8-9), Paul informs us that we were created to do good works (Ephesians 2:10). Paul expects just as much of a changed life as James does: “Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; the old has gone, the new has come” (2 Corinthians 5:17). James and Paul do not disagree in their teaching regarding salvation. They approach the same subject from different perspectives. Paul simply emphasized that justification is by faith alone while James put emphasis on the fact that genuine faith in Christ produces good works
3. Faith in Christ Alone = Justification – Works (Fruit) which is antinomianism, in their life there is no evidence of transformation, they signed a card and prayed a prayer. Antinomianism says that we don’t need the Law to prove we are saved.
Question: “What is antinomianism?” (gotquestions.org)
Answer: The word antinomianism comes from two Greek words, anti, meaning “against”; and nomos, meaning “law.” Antinomianism means “against the law.” Theologically, antinomianism is the belief that there are no moral laws God expects Christians to obey. Antinomianism takes a biblical teaching to an unbiblical conclusion. The biblical teaching is that Christians are not required to observe the Old Testament Law as a means of salvation. When Jesus Christ died on the cross, He fulfilled the Old Testament Law (Romans 10:4; Galatians 3:23-25; Ephesians 2:15). The unbiblical conclusion is that there is no moral law God expects Christians to obey.
The apostle Paul dealt with the issue of antinomianism in Romans 6:1-2, “What shall we say, then? Shall we go on sinning so that grace may increase? By no means! We died to sin; how can we live in it any longer?” The most frequent attack on the doctrine of salvation by grace alone is that it encourages sin. People may wonder, “If I am saved by grace and all my sins are forgiven, why not sin all I want?” That thinking is not the result of true conversion because true conversion yields a greater desire to obey, not a lesser one. God’s desire—and our desire when we are regenerated by His Spirit—is that we strive not to sin. Out of gratitude for His grace and forgiveness, we want to please Him. God has given us His infinitely gracious gift in salvation through Jesus (John 3:16; Romans 5:8). Our response is to consecrate our lives to Him out of love, worship, and gratitude for what He has done for us (Romans 12:1-2). Antinomianism is unbiblical in that it misapplies the meaning of God’s gracious favor.
A second reason that antinomianism is unbiblical is that there is a moral law God expects us to obey. First John 5:3 tells us, “This is love for God: to obey His commands. And His commands are not burdensome.” What is this law God expects us to obey? It is the law of Christ – “Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind. This is the first and greatest commandment. And the second is like it: Love your neighbor as yourself. All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments” (Matthew 22:37-40). No, we are not under the Old Testament Law. Yes, we are under the law of Christ. The law of Christ is not an extensive list of legal codes. It is a law of love. If we love God with all our heart, soul, mind, and strength, we will do nothing to displease Him. If we love our neighbors as ourselves, we will do nothing to harm them. Obeying the law of Christ is not a requirement to earn or maintain salvation. The law of Christ is what God expects of a Christian.
Antinomianism is contrary to everything the Bible teaches. God expects us to live a life of morality, integrity, and love. Jesus Christ freed us from the burdensome commands of the Old Testament Law, but that is not a license to sin, but rather a covenant of grace. We are to strive to overcome sin and cultivate righteousness, depending on the Holy Spirit to help us. The fact that we are graciously freed from the demands of the Old Testament Law should result in our living our lives in obedience to the law of Christ. First John 2:3-6 declares, “We know that we have come to know Him if we obey His commands. The man who says, ‘I know Him,’ but does not do what He commands is a liar, and the truth is not in him. But if anyone obeys His word, God’s love is truly made complete in him. This is how we know we are in Him: Whoever claims to live in Him must walk as Jesus did.” (gotquestions.org)
4. Faith in Christ Alone = Justification + Works (Fruit) which is the theology of the reformers. If there’s a root there is fruit. Obedience does not mean that we are sinless but that we sin less. Martin Luther said, “justification does not require the works of the law, but it does require a living faith, which performs its works.”
Refer to the pathway number 3 question and answer. The bottom line is that when we are truly saved, we desire to bear fruit and do good works.
* Additional Commentary:
Matthew 7:13–14 / In one sense the Golden Rule represents the high point of the sermon. The four paragraphs that follow contrast the two ways (Matthew 7:13–14), the two kinds of fruit (Matthew 7:15–20), the two kinds of followers (Matthew 7:21–23), and the two kinds of builders (Matthew 7:24–27). In each case there is a sharp distinction drawn between true discipleship and mere religious activity. Jesus brings his sermon to a close with a clear call for action.
Matthew’s use of the gate/road is a bit ambiguous in that it combines both gates and roads. Does one enter through a gate onto a road (Matthew 7:13), or does a road lead ultimately to a gate (Matthew 7:)? But the point is clear: One way is broad and easy. It is the way of self-centeredness, and the majority travel that road. The other way is narrow and hard to find. Only a few travel the road of personal commitment and discipline. One road leads to destruction and the other to eternal life. The saying is primarily eschatological, although it speaks as well of life here and now. It describes two ways to live: two ways that separate and lead to two distinct destinies. The choice is clear: follow the crowd with its characteristic bent toward taking the path of least resistance, or join the few who accept the limiting demands of loyalty. The easy way will turn out hard (it ends in destruction), whereas the hard way will lead to eternal joy (life).
Matthew 7:15–20 / For several hundred years before the time of Christ it was generally believed that prophecy had ceased. The period between the two Testaments is sometimes called the silent years. With John the Baptist the prophetic voice returned, and in early Christianity prophecy flourished. To the crowd that gathered on the Day of Pentecost, Peter explained that the phenomenon of tongues was the fulfillment of Joel’s promise that in the last days God would pour out his Spirit on everyone, so that young men would see visions, old men would have dreams, and both men and women would proclaim his message (Acts 2:17–18; cf. 1 Corinthians 14:29–31).
As the church grew, the problem of false prophets became acute. Jesus had warned against the rise of false prophets who would deceive the people (Matthew 24:11, 24). John also warned his followers (1 John 4:1–3; Revelation 2:20). How were the Christians to recognize a false prophet? In earlier days a prophet was discredited if what he proclaimed in the name of the Lord did not come true (Deuteronomy 18:20–22). The Didache had some simple tests to identify a false prophet (if he stays more than two days or asks for money, 11.5–6). It is “from his behavior, then, [that] the false prophet and the true prophet shall be known” (Didache 11.8).
Matthew 7:21–23 / Since what people do reveals who they really are, it follows that simply calling Jesus Lord is not enough. On the day of judgment false prophets will protest that in the name of Jesus they prophesied, drove out many demons, and worked many miracles, only to be declared evildoers unknown to the Lord. Only those who do what God desires will enter the kingdom of heaven. Judgment is based upon living out the will of God, not on claims of apostolic activity.
Lord was a common form of polite address (much like our “sir”), although the present context (final judgment) reflects its later use as a reverential title. The earliest Christian creed was “Jesus is Lord” (1 Corinthians 12:3). It implied that he was accepted as master and that his teaching was therefore binding. To claim allegiance (Lord, Lord) does not secure entrance to the kingdom of heaven (the final state, when God’s sovereign reign is perfectly realized). Only those who do the will of my Father may enter.
On that day (Matthew 7:22) refers to the day of judgment (Malachi 3:17–18; the “day of the Lord,” Joel 2:1; Amos 5:18; etc.). At that time false prophets will make all sorts of claims regarding what they did on earth. Some will have invoked the name of Jesus to perform exorcisms. The seven sons of Sceva are an example of this (Acts 19:13–16). The use of a name in this connection implies full authority of the one named. Peter commanded the lame man at the Beautiful Gate to get up and walk “in the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth” (Acts 3:6).
Matthew 7:24–27 / Jesus has just taught that false prophets can be detected by what they do (Matthew 7:16) and that it is action, not rhetoric, that provides entrance into the kingdom of heaven (Matthew 7:21). This principle of judgment based on deeds is now applied to everyone. Jesus pictures two builders.
The purpose of the parable is to warn those who have listened to the sermon that wisdom calls for action. The wise man … hears and puts [Jesus’ words] into practice: the foolish man … hears and does not put them into practice (Matthew 7:24, 26). The storm is final judgment. Although both houses may look very much alike, only one will withstand the final testing. The wise not only hear the teachings of Jesus (these words of mine, Matthew 7:24) but make a concerted effort to live out in their daily lives all that the teaching implies. The foolish may have built a well-structured theology, but it is the foundation, not the house, that determines what happens in the last days. “Obedience to his [Jesus’] teaching is the one solid basis for withstanding the future crisis” (Filson, p. 108).
Matthew 7:28–29 / This is a transition from the teaching of Jesus to a section recording a number of his miraculous deeds (Matthew 8:1–9:34). It opens with a formula (kai egeneto) that is found at the juncture of each of Matthew’s blocks of teaching and the narrative that follows (Matthew 11:1; 13:53; 19:1; 26:1) but nowhere else in his Gospel.
When Jesus finished his teaching, the crowds were amazed at the authority with which he taught. Unlike the scribes, who based their opinions on the explanations offered by all the rabbis who preceded them, Jesus had a self-authenticating ring of authority to his words. It was the same authority that led him to forgive the sins of the paralyzed man (Matthew 9:6) and that he gave to his disciples so that they could drive out demons and heal the sick (Matthew 10:1). It was an expression of who he was (cf. Matthew 28:18) and was recognized immediately. There was no need for his teaching to be buttressed by philosophical argument or persuasive rhetoric. It validated itself to the human conscience.
* Mounce, R. H. (2011). Matthew. Understanding the Bible Commentary Series (67–70). Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books.
[print_link] [email_link] [Based on my classes with Richard D. Leineweber, Jr. c. 2000]
New Husband By Friday
I know this is really a commercial for his book, but Kevin Leman is a fantastic communicator. The information in his books can change men and their marriages. Take a look at this CBN report on “Have a New Husband by Friday.”
How to Bless Others
This is a very simple strategy to influence those around you. In community, we hold each other accountable to actually DO one of these five things every day.
B – Begin with Prayer.
L – Listen, to hear people’s hurts, dreams, hopes, fears, and desires.
E – Eat, share a meal with someone, creating community and conversation.
S – Serve, after listening and eating together, it is easy to discover ways to serve others.
S – Story, seek those opportunities to tell YOUR story (testimony) or HIS story (the gospel).
What Kills Missional Community?
“Just allow me for just a couple of minutes to discuss briefly what will kill your missional community before you even get it off the ground with all these great strategies and all these paradigm shifts and it is this: Consumerism. Consumerism is a cancer to missional community. It will destroy it from the inside out. There’s the obvious application here, in that attempting to build any outward facing faith community with believers who are intent on just getting their own needs met just is simply unsustainable. It’s just not going to work. But leaders before we point the finger at all these selfish believers who are stealing all our time and energy from being missionaries to our communities, let it be said: if we develop a church built on serving the saved, then the already blessed people will come wanting more blessings. It’s just that simple. You will draw the type of people who crave what you’re offering. Only Christians want forty Christian programs to chose from…If we’re positioned to reached Christians then Christians we will reach. Not that there is anything inherently wrong with programs, but the church has a very limited amount of resources, both human and financial. So, if we consume them all for saved people, then we cannot expect our folks to live on mission else where, because they have already spent all of there expendable time and energy on the church campus. So if we’re drowning in a sea of Christian consumers, we better take a hard look at the scaffolding we have built.”
Fear is a Barrier to Faith
Today we look into Luke 12:4-12, focusing on one verse Luke 12:5. The point is that Jesus needed to address the fears of his would-be followers, fears that would prevent them from repenting and believing. Fear of making your faith known, or going public, can be a real barrier to one’s salvation (Proverbs 29:25). Another perk of this lesson is to help believers to talk with lost friends about the fears that they have about following Jesus Christ. Once a person is a follower of Jesus, our love for him casts out fear (1 John 4:17-18). The one fear that should cast out all other fears is the fear of God (Luke 12:5, Hebrews 2:14-15, 9:27).
The Pharisee in Luke 11 acts like a friend in public (even inviting Jesus to dinner) but his hidden agenda is revealed in Luke 11:53-54. They intended to execute Jesus within a couple of months but since the crowds liked Jesus, they had to treat him in a civil manner while in public. Jesus knows about their plots yet is unafraid. They might be able to kill the body, but eternity is not in their hands. So, this situation begs the question, “Do you cower before bullies who can kill you, or cower before God who can not only kill you but throw you into hell?” Don’t be afraid of other human beings!
It appears that “do not fear” is a repeated phrase in the Bible, when people were afraid to publicly profess faith in Jesus (Luke 12:5, 7, see also John 7:13, 9:22, 19:38), and the rest of the Bible (Acts 18:9, Hebrew 13:6, 1 Peter 3:14, Revelation 2:10).
- Of what was Christ’s audience afraid (Luke 12:8, 11)?
- All they could do is threaten physical harm or make life miserable (Luke 12:11).
- People could be put out of the synagogue (John 9:22, 7:13).
- Many who came to Christ were disowned by their families, lost employment, or socially snubbed.
- How does Jesus address his audience (Luke 12:4)? He calls them his friends which is totally opposite to the hostility of the religious leaders. Don’t fear them, they cannot harm you past the grave.
- What would be forfeited if his hearers confessed Christ before men (Luke 12:4)? The worst thing would be their own lives, but even that would be a promotion, to heaven.
- What did Jesus command them to do (Luke 12:5, 7)? Here is the command:
- Fear – aorist imperative (Luke 12:5).
- Do not fear – present imperative (Luke 12:7).
- Who has the power to cast anyone into hell (Luke 12:5)? God (not Satan) is the “One” in Luke 12:5.
- How does the Bible describe hell? The word “gehanna” is found 12 times in the New Testament, 11 in the Synoptic Gospels, and every time it is from the mouth of Jesus himself. Gehenna is a Greek transliteration of Ben Hinnom (valley of Hinnom), a narrow ravine where Ahaz and Manasseh introduced pagan worship of the fire gods (2 Chronicles 28:3, 33:16, Jeremiah 7:31). People would take their babies and toss them into the red-hot arms of Molech, where the children would scream and cry as their flesh burned. Josiah stopped this abomination (2 Kings 23:10). This location later became a trash dump, like an incinerator for the city. Dead criminals were tossed in, dead animals, trash, it was continually burning, so with smoke rising, Jesus gives the people a visual image of what hell would be like. It is important to note that hell is NOT annihilation (See below).
- Matthew 13:42 – furnace, with weeping and gnashing of teeth, a loud expression of grief; wailing in hell will be continual. Who could recognize a friend’s voice in such an environment?
- Matthew 25:41 – a place prepared for the devil and his demons.
- Matthew 25:46 – eternal punishment, indicating a tormenting process that is accompanied by fear.
- Mark 9:48 – where worms don’t die and the fire is not quenched; Not only will fire not give off light, but does not consume the bodies of the unredeemed.
- 2 Thessalonians 1:9 – eternal destruction, perhaps physical ruin.
- 2 Peter 2:17, Jude 1:13 – black darkness, literally “blackness of darkness.” People might say that will be in hell where their friends are, but it will be so dark, they won’t be able to grope around and find them. Imagine being in a new place, where it’s hot (as hell) and dark with no light at all (like a cave in darkness).
- Revelation 2:11, 20:6, 14, 21:8 – the second death, “hurt” indicates the person’s body being injured.
- Revelation 19:20, 20:10, 14, 21:8 – a lake of fire and brimstone, a place for unbelievers after the Great White Throne judgment.
- How does Jesus encourage them to go public (Luke 12:6-7)? He promised them a Father’s care.
- Sparrows are insignificant yet God cares for them, so how much more will the Father care for them?
- The word “cent” means a penny. They were sold five for two pennies, so if you bought four, they would throw in one for nothing.
- What does it mean to confess Christ before men (Luke 12:8)? The word “confess” is used 27 times in the New Testament, meaning to affirm, declare, admit, acknowledge, or agree. This means to confess openly or state publicly.
- What happens to those who don’t confess Jesus before men (Luke 12:9)? A denial in heaven, I never knew you (Matthew 7:21).
- Can a person deny Christ yet still be a Christian (Matthew 10:32-33, 2 Timothy 2:12, 1 John 2:23)?
- Luke 22:54-62 – Peter’s denials.
- Romans 10:9-10 – the relationship between belief and confession.
- Titus 1:16 – relationship between belief and by our deeds denying him.
- 1 John 2:22 – denying Jesus, lying, antichrist.
- Why does Jesus warn against blasphemy against the Holy Spirit (Luke 12:10)? The audience was in danger of committing the unpardonable sin (seeing the miracles of Jesus in the flesh and attributing these works to the enemy, Matthew 12:31-32, Mark 3:29-30).
- What does Christ promise in Luke 12:11-12? Divine assistance when their faith led them into harm’s way.
- This is a striking contrast to blasphemy against the Holy Spirit, because believers will find that the Holy Spirit actually speaks through them.
- The circumstances of the Spirit speaking through believers is not preaching but persecution, in which preparation of an adequate defense would be impossible (Matthew 10:19-20, Luke 21:14-15).
- We should not neglect this needed preparation (2 Timothy 2:15).
- Luke 12:11-12 address those occasions that you don’t even know they are coming, when you will be taken away and made to give an account for the hope inside of you (1 Peter 3:15).
- Jesus’ enemies blasphemed the Holy Spirit while the disciples would be helped by the Holy Spirit.
What About Annihilation?
Many scholars have abandoned this traditional view on hell, which can also lead to Universalism as well. John Stott has four arguments to support his position, and then I have included a response under each point.
- The language of eternal punishment speaks of destruction, which normally means extinction.
- John 3:16 – perish means to destroy utterly, this is not extinction but ruin and loss, not of being but well-being.
- 2 Thessalonians 1:8-9 – destruction means utter and hopeless ruin, the loss of all that gives worth to existence. So Paul refers to physical separation (God and the lost) more than physical annihilation.
- Revelation 2:11 – this hurt will be experienced throughout eternity, the idea of a person’s body being injured.
- The imagery of fire is for destruction, not torment (fire burns things up).
- Revelation 20:10 – this is sort of point blank in response to points one and two, tormented day and night forever.
- Revelation 14:9-11 – torment goes on forever, no rest day and night.
- The notion of justice precludes eternal punishment. How can sins committed in time be punished for eternity? Where is the justice? The penalty inflicted ought to be according to the evil done.
- The amount of time it takes to commit the crime does not factor into the punishment. If I kill a store owner in two minutes, the judge won’t take that into consideration.
- It’s not about the time it takes to commit a crime but the nature of the crime. It’s not about how long we sin, but what sin is.
- The nature of sin is an act of rebellion against an infinite and holy God, which brings an eternal penalty. Threatening to kill me is not as serious as a threat to kill the President of the USA.
- A crime against the Creator brings a penalty worthy of the sin committed. Humans can never pay the penalty we deserve. We often forget the holiness of God and the true nature of our sin.
- The eternal existence of hell would not bring everything fully into a right relationship with God.
- Revelation 19:1-6 – God’s judgments are true and righteous, he has avenged the blood of the saints, the smoke rises forever…
- Revelation 18:20 – rejoice over the pronounced judgment. God’s righteousness has been revealed in the destruction of his enemies.
- God’s wrath is an occasion for God’s glory…
- Revelation 19:1 – the outpouring of God’s wrath against sin highlights the mercy shown in saving grace.
- Revelation 19:2a – the outpouring of God’s wrath displays his righteousness.
- Revelation 19:2b – the outpouring of God’s wrath confirms his love for the saints (or they suffered in vain).
- Revelation 19:5 – the outpouring of God’s wrath magnifies the holy fear that is due him.
- Revelation 19:6 – the outpouring of God’s wrath proves that the sovereign Lord is Ruler over everything, the Lord reigns. All his enemies will be brought under his authority.
Take Away:
- How do you feel about everything done in secret being revealed (Luke 12:2-3)?
- Jesus teaches us to fear yet be fearless (Luke 12:4-5).
- How can we be assured that we have not committed the unpardonable sin (Luke 12:10)?
- What is Jesus teaching about the disciple’s security in the face of opposition (Luke 12:11)?
- When have you taken a stand (a risk) for Jesus in a public way? What did you learn?
- How can you remind yourself of your importance to God each day this week?
- How can we pray for those who suffer due to their relationship with Jesus?
- What is a step you can take to better prepare yourself for coming persecution?
[Based on my classes with Richard D. Leineweber, Jr. c. 2000]